{"schema":"hottub-news/story/v1","story":"st_esnoe2b3uf4ezsor37ca","title":"Ley de Tierras: la Corte Suprema aclaró que su fallo fue por una cuestión procesal y no afecta al régimen","title_en":"Land Law: The Supreme Court clarified that its ruling was on a procedural issue and does not affect the regime","outlets":3,"brief":null,"page":"https://hottub.news/stories/land-law-the-supreme-court-clarified-that-its-ruling-was-on-a-esnoe2b3uf","count":3,"items":[{"id":"n_nblpo5glcdhs275qjdra","seq":1151193,"kind":"article","title":"La Corte Suprema aclaró que el fallo sobre la Ley de Tierras no se expide sobre la cuestión de fondo","title_en":"The Supreme Court clarified that the ruling on the Land Law does not address the substantive issue","url":"https://www.c5n.com/politica/la-corte-suprema-aclaro-que-el-fallo-la-ley-tierras-no-se-expide-la-cuestion-fondo-n250433","summary":"El máximo tribunal sostuvo que \"solo se decidió un aspecto procesal, que se refiere a la legitimación de una asociación para obtener una medida cautelar\".","published":"2026-10-01T13:07:00Z","seen":"2026-10-01T14:27:36Z","lang":"es","country":"AR","source":{"id":"kite-c5n-com-7255bc","name":"c5n.com","domain":"c5n.com","outlet":{"wikidata":"Q5030977","name":"C5N","type":"broadcaster","country":"AR","designations":["specialty channel","television station"]}},"via":"kite-c5n-com-7255bc","topics":["política"],"entities":[{"id":"Q190752","name":"supreme court","type":"org"}],"story":"st_esnoe2b3uf4ezsor37ca","category":"politics","category_p":0.7099999785423279,"sentiment":"neutral","tone":-0.15000000596046448,"political":0.7400000095367432},{"id":"n_3pav4svmv4x34nobrgoa","seq":1144831,"kind":"article","title":"La Corte aclaró que su fallo es sobre el aspecto procesal y no sobre la validez del régimen de tierras","title_en":"The Court clarified that its ruling is on the procedural aspect and not on the validity of the land regime","url":"https://www.eldia.com/politica-y-economia/la-corte-aclaro-que-su-fallo-es-sobre-el-aspecto-procesal-y-no-sobre-la-validez-del-regimen-de-tierras-politica-y-economia_1790858760","summary":"También cuestionó los \"discursos de odio y descalificación\" surgidos a partir de la resolución","published":"2026-10-01T12:57:14Z","seen":"2026-10-01T13:26:13Z","lang":"es","country":"AR","source":{"id":"kite-eldia-com-2e1c87","name":"eldia.com","domain":"eldia.com","outlet":{"wikidata":"Q3393926","name":"El Día","type":"newspaper","country":"AR","designations":["newspaper"]}},"via":"kite-eldia-com-2e1c87","topics":["política y economía"],"entities":[{"id":"Q213555","name":"Corte","type":"org"},{"id":"Q3874799","name":"Volodymyr Zelenskyy","type":"person"}],"story":"st_esnoe2b3uf4ezsor37ca","category":"politics","category_p":0.7699999809265137,"sentiment":"neutral","tone":-0.1899999976158142,"political":0.8600000143051147},{"id":"n_esnoe2b3uf4ezsor37ca","seq":1151321,"kind":"article","title":"Ley de Tierras: la Corte Suprema aclaró que su fallo fue por una cuestión procesal y no afecta al régimen","title_en":"Land Law: The Supreme Court clarified that its ruling was on a procedural issue and does not affect the regime","url":"https://www.cronista.com/economia-politica/ley-de-tierras-la-corte-suprema-aclaro-que-su-fallo-fue-por-una-cuestion-procesal-y-no-afecta-al-regimen","summary":"La Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación salió este jueves a aclarar el alcance de su reciente sentencia en la causa “CECIM c. Gobierno Nacional” , luego de las críticas y cuestionamientos que generó el fallo. El máximo tribunal remarcó que no resolvió la controversia de fondo sobre la Ley de Tierras ni fijó una posición sobre la constitucionalidad del artículo 154 del DNU 70/2023. Según explicó la Corte que difundió en las últimas horas, en el expediente “sólo se decidió…","published":"2026-10-01T12:49:32Z","seen":"2026-10-01T14:27:36Z","lang":"es","country":"AR","source":{"id":"kite-cronista-com-3a850e","name":"cronista.com","domain":"cronista.com","outlet":{"wikidata":"Q778813","name":"El Cronista","type":"newspaper","country":"AR","designations":["newspaper"]}},"via":"kite-cronista-com-3a850e","entities":[{"id":"Q190752","name":"supreme court","type":"org"}],"image":"https://www.cronista.com/resizer/v2/5DLO7K75YREDTAMJPT2J3KPOGI.webp?auth=f76417e3960c61f83a82593850c8910febc8750ee356af6f9e7a5f71d53e8181&height=900&smart=true&width=1200","story":"st_esnoe2b3uf4ezsor37ca","category":"politics","category_p":0.7400000095367432,"sentiment":"neutral","tone":-0.23000000417232513,"political":0.8199999928474426}]}