{"schema":"hottub-news/story/v1","story":"st_hunh3ps4xy3u2teil6xa","title":"哈佛大学心理学家：渲染“AI 末日”无助于应对风险，应审慎开展安全工程","title_en":"Harvard University psychologist: Rendering 'AI doomsday' does not help address risks, should cautiously conduct safety engineering","outlets":1,"brief":null,"page":"https://hottub.news/stories/harvard-university-psychologist-rendering-ai-doomsday-does-not-help-hunh3ps4xy","count":1,"items":[{"id":"n_hunh3ps4xy3u2teil6xa","seq":553209,"kind":"article","title":"哈佛大学心理学家：渲染“AI 末日”无助于应对风险，应审慎开展安全工程","title_en":"Harvard University psychologist: Rendering 'AI doomsday' does not help address risks, should cautiously conduct safety engineering","url":"https://www.ithome.com/1/008/100.htm","summary":"IT之家 9 月 29 日消息，当地时间 28 日，据外媒 The Decoder 报道，哈佛大学心理学家史蒂文 · 平克认为， AI 毁灭人类的风险遭到了夸大 。他在 Quillette 发表致精神科医生、科技博主斯科特 · 亚历山大的公开信，阐述了自己的理由。 此前，亚历山大向平克发起了挑战，邀请他公开辩论 AI 带来的生存风险。平克拒绝参加，称这类辩论不过是“供人围观的竞技活动”，认为“回形针最大化器”等末日设想混淆了智能与支配欲。 IT之家注：“回形针最大化器”假设 AI 会为了生产更多回形针而牺牲整个人类，同时还预设 AI 系统会疯狂地只追求一个目标。 平克过去一直对 AI 较为乐观，但也承认自己 低估了大语言模型最终能够具备多强的能力 ，也没有料到 AI 公司发布产品时会如此鲁莽。颇具讽刺意味的是，推动这场发布竞赛的许多人，恰恰来自一直警告这些风险的群体。 平克真正重视的风险是 生物恐怖主义、网络攻击以及缺乏约束的 AI 智能体 。他写道，渲染末日情景无助于应对这些危险，真正有效的做法是 开展审慎的安全工程…","published":"2026-09-29T01:00:25Z","seen":"2026-09-29T01:06:31Z","lang":"zh","country":"CN","source":{"id":"kite-ithome-com-f1cdd0","name":"ithome.com","domain":"ithome.com","outlet":{"wikidata":"Q28413779","name":"IThome","type":"website","country":"CN","designations":["website"]}},"via":"kite-ithome-com-f1cdd0","entities":[{"id":"Q13371","name":"Harvard University","type":"org"}],"story":"st_hunh3ps4xy3u2teil6xa","category":"science-technology","category_p":0.5799999833106995,"sentiment":"negative","tone":-0.7099999785423279,"political":0.11999999731779099}]}