{"schema":"hottub-news/story/v1","story":"st_ke6e7r6techojvpvb23a","title":"川大\"取消烟民减免学费资格\"上热搜，但我关注的是后面的\"沉迷网络\"","title_en":"Sichuan University 'canceling smokers' tuition reduction eligibility' trending, but what I'm concerned about is the 'internet addiction' afterwards","outlets":1,"brief":null,"page":"https://hottub.news/stories/sichuan-university-canceling-smokers-tuition-reduction-eligibility-ke6e7r6tec","count":1,"items":[{"id":"n_ke6e7r6techojvpvb23a","seq":410177,"kind":"article","title":"川大\"取消烟民减免学费资格\"上热搜，但我关注的是后面的\"沉迷网络\"","title_en":"Sichuan University 'canceling smokers' tuition reduction eligibility' trending, but what I'm concerned about is the 'internet addiction' afterwards","url":"https://www.huxiu.com/article/4894353.html?f=rss","summary":"本文来自微信公众号： 高校历史现况研究 ，作者：高历研 最近，四川大学一则每年照常发布的学年通知，毫无征兆的引爆了全网。 《2026—2027学年本科生学费减免工作通知》被网友截图转出，其中一行规定瞬间戳中舆论痛点：有吸烟、酗酒、沉迷网络或其他消费型不良嗜好者，取消学费减免资格。 讨论很快分成了泾渭分明的两派。支持者说，学费减免是面向家庭经济特别困难学生的公共帮扶资源，本就该优先留给生活节俭、真正有需要的人。常年抽烟是稳定的持续性非必要支出，一年烟钱动辄几千元，和“经济特别困难”的定位本身就存在矛盾，用助学资金支撑烟草消费，才是对其他困难学生的不公平。 反对者则认为，贫困认定的核心本该是家庭收入、负债情况、突发变故这些客观硬指标，不该用个人生活习惯一刀切。成年学生只要不在禁烟区抽烟，个人消费选择不该成为剥夺资助资格的理由，更何况条款标准模糊、取证困难，最后很容易演变成主观判断甚至互相举报。 两边吵得沸沸扬扬。但说实话，我并不关注，我第一眼扫到这条新闻的时候，注意力根本没停在“吸烟”两个字上。 反而是后面的四个字，引起了我的兴趣。 “沉迷网络”。…","published":"2026-09-28T10:47:11Z","seen":"2026-09-28T11:18:29Z","lang":"zh","country":"CN","source":{"id":"kite-huxiu-com-dbd1aa","name":"huxiu.com","domain":"rss.huxiu.com"},"via":"kite-huxiu-com-dbd1aa","authors":["author"],"entities":[{"id":"Q2281517","name":"Sichuan University","type":"org"}],"story":"st_ke6e7r6techojvpvb23a","category":"education","category_p":0.30000001192092896,"sentiment":"negative","tone":-0.550000011920929,"political":0.18000000715255737}]}